發表文章 | 發起投票 | 回覆 |
英國高仕文勳爵揭露英國政府對BNO再次講大話
Peter Goldsmith QC 喺2007年曾經檢討英國國籍法,並認為BN(O)係 anomalous (異乎尋常),係應該俾翻公民身分
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Politics/documents/2008/03/11/citizenship-report-full.pdf
最具爭議係呢段,亦都係英國政府用黎做擋箭牌
However, I am advised that this would be a breach of the commitments made between China and the UK in the 1984 Joint Declaration on the future of Hong Kong, an international treaty between the two countries;
上次十萬人聯署得到嘅回應就係咁https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/244402
但今日SCMP報導 Peter Goldsmith寫左封信俾內政大臣 Priti Patel, 信裏面澄清
“From the materials I have been able to review, it is my view that the UK government can extend full right of abode to BN(O) passport holders without breaching its side of the Sino-British Joint Declaration,”
BNO平權並不會違反中英聯合聲明
“The exchanged memoranda cannot be interpreted as imposing a permanent restriction on how the United Kingdom should treat the status of BN(O)s,”
中英聯合聲明嘅備忘錄並唔係永遠限制左BNO嘅權利
The intention for the BDTC conversion to BN(O) “has already been discharged”, he said, adding: “The memorandum has no relevance to the UK’s present consideration of what rights should be enjoyed by holders of the BN(O) passports in the future. That is a matter solely for the UK.”
英國已經將所有BDTC-HK變哂做BN(O)
英國點樣對待BN(O)係英國內政
今個月Lord Ashdown Memorial 彭督亦曾經講過類似嘅野https://twitter.com/lukedepulford/status/1224419003193491461?s=21
其實好多人成日都話BNO係割97後
但呢樣不公係因為英國政府不公
無論係對待BNO定係BNO後代
其實BNO後代其實係應該擁有英國國籍
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Politics/documents/2008/03/11/citizenship-report-full.pdf
最具爭議係呢段,亦都係英國政府用黎做擋箭牌
However, I am advised that this would be a breach of the commitments made between China and the UK in the 1984 Joint Declaration on the future of Hong Kong, an international treaty between the two countries;
上次十萬人聯署得到嘅回應就係咁https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/244402
但今日SCMP報導 Peter Goldsmith寫左封信俾內政大臣 Priti Patel, 信裏面澄清
“From the materials I have been able to review, it is my view that the UK government can extend full right of abode to BN(O) passport holders without breaching its side of the Sino-British Joint Declaration,”
BNO平權並不會違反中英聯合聲明
“The exchanged memoranda cannot be interpreted as imposing a permanent restriction on how the United Kingdom should treat the status of BN(O)s,”
中英聯合聲明嘅備忘錄並唔係永遠限制左BNO嘅權利
The intention for the BDTC conversion to BN(O) “has already been discharged”, he said, adding: “The memorandum has no relevance to the UK’s present consideration of what rights should be enjoyed by holders of the BN(O) passports in the future. That is a matter solely for the UK.”
英國已經將所有BDTC-HK變哂做BN(O)
英國點樣對待BN(O)係英國內政
今個月Lord Ashdown Memorial 彭督亦曾經講過類似嘅野https://twitter.com/lukedepulford/status/1224419003193491461?s=21
其實好多人成日都話BNO係割97後
但呢樣不公係因為英國政府不公
無論係對待BNO定係BNO後代
其實BNO後代其實係應該擁有英國國籍
本貼文共有 0 個回覆
發表文章 | 發起投票 | 回覆 |